Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |overholt@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-14 15:59:41 EDT --- - the URL is no longer valid because we're a few versions behind. Here's one that works: http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/configuration/source/commons-configuration-1.4-src.tar.gz - I verified the md5sums all match (upstream .md5, one I downloaded, in-SRPM .tar.gz) - I looked through a random sampling of 5 or so source files and they all say ASL 2.0 as does LICENSE.txt. Therefore, the License field should reflect this. - there some whitespace and other minor-looking differences between the .pom file as included in the SRPM and what I can get from upstream Otherwise, things look okay for pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review