Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Jochen Schmitt <jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt <jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-14 14:17:11 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with packagename + Package name follow the naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project home page + Package contains valid Provides/Obsoletes tags + Package contains proper scriptlets for ldconfig and servies Bad: - Package seems to have a needles Source1 tag - Could not able to download source tarball via spectool -g Upstream tar ball was no renamed for the new project name - Tar ball doesn't matches with upstream release 1ef45901d3c3479ad767877a7663324e fedora-ds-base-1.2.0.tar.bz2 b691b742fef04a170ad7ac27a03d5cdc ../SOURCES/389-ds-base-1.2.0.tar.bz2 Because I have the feelling, that the renaming process of the upstream project was not finisch, I will wait for a formal review until this will be happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review