Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #36 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <promac@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-12 18:27:05 EDT --- SRPMS URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/yafaray-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #35) > Is there many differences between 0.1.0 stable and the today's snapshot. Is this a question or an affirmative? > > /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct is probably not wanted there. > I adapted the spec for building either the snapshot or the official release. > Abput /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py , Are you sure we haven't any > problem with the use of such architecture independant directory, against files > been in /usr/lib64/python*/site-packages/ ? > (every .so and .py? should be in the same architecture dependent directory, > probably - at least It, that's what I would expect) > Furthermore, yafaray may require to write configuration files (relative to the > given user), so this is aimed to be > I did not change this yet. I have to think what to do. > > This file : /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0/yafaray-snapshot.sh > Doesn't need to be in %doc as it has nothing to do with yafaray-blender > subpackage. (can be provided within the cvs anyway). Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review