Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #17 from Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-12 13:25:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Sorry, I've been busy this past week. > > I'm waiting on you to merge the changes from Ryan that you think are > appropriate and then post new versions of the spec file and srpm. Ok, that is the kind of stuff that I don't know hoe to procede, that is way I ask things like "that is the way in witch packages are treated..", meaning that I don't know ho is making the changes and from ho are they take it....I was under the impresion that the Ryan attached .spec files was the "updated ones", so no idea that you was waiting to me to merge the changes... So, ok here are the updated files: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb.spec http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0-1.1.fc10.src.rpm Hope that sitll can make it at least for fed11 updates...what about the gdb one? Cheers, Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review