Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-11 12:49:31 EDT --- > I guess the "no-documentation" ones can be ignored. > You should also use the python_sitelib macro, as the module should live in > /usr/lib64/python2.5/... Plan on doing that but it somewhere slightly non default (looking at my system its not the only one that does it) but I have reported it upstream and will correct. > For the sub-packages, I'd rather have: > Development files for %{name}, <insert short description>. > > Similar for the python sub-package. No problems. Fixed. > I think the -python sub-package is missing a python requires. Rest looks good. I thought that python was automatically done. It appears not. Fixed. SPEC is same spot as before. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libplist-0.12-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review