Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-11 08:54:37 EDT --- fedora review zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-11 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output: zita-convolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * Package is named according to the guidelines * The specfile is named after the package * The package is licensed under a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) * The license tag mayches the license information in the source * The package includes the license file (COPYING) * The specfile is written in legible English * Source matches upstream and is latest version 892ef99cf39b6a8e87639efdcd96dbd5 zita-convolver-1.0.0.tar.bz2 892ef99cf39b6a8e87639efdcd96dbd5 SRPM/zita-convolver-1.0.0.tar.bz2 * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * Build requires are sane * Package calles ldconfig approproately * The package owns the directories it creates * No double listed files * File permissions are sane and %files has %defattrs * %clean clears buildroot * The specfile uses macros consistently * Package contains code * %doc is not essential for running * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF-8 Package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review