Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-10 00:18:01 EDT --- Hello: (In reply to comment #9) > The sipwitch.py issue is partially related to swig, since it is generated by > swig. I changed the patch to install using INSTALL_DATA, and maybe I will need > to set explicit attrib too? I will test this a bit here... - For this just using %attr(...) or using chmod at %install is enough. > Incidentally, if gcrypt is not used, sipwitch falls back to openssl libcrypto. > This in fact should have been preferred since libeXosip2 already links in > openssl, but it seems to fail to detect libcrypto support (even for md5), and > that is strange. Also I tested mostly with the gcrypt crypto functions, so it > is probably safer to keep using those for now. Anyway, at some point we all > should try to converge on nss based stuff :). - Well, on rawhide libeXosip2 is not linked against openssl library. Note that this is under GPLv3+, and strictly speaking openssl license conflicts with GPL (any version): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review