Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli <guido.grazioli@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-09 05:02:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must > > call ldconfig in %post and %postun > > - add ldconfig calls > > Although the guidelines don't say so explicitly, I don't think it makes sense > to apply this requirement to shareables that are extension modules for > interpreted languages like TCL, since the code isn't activated by ld itself, > but rather by the interpreter (e.g. /usr/bin/tclsh) with calls to dlopen(). > This specfile was based on an existing Fedora 10 specfile for the tcl-zlib > extension, which does not perform ldconfig calls, either. Hello Bryson, ok i think you are right on this one. Some tcl packages have the ldconfig command indeed, however you convinced me that it doesnt actually makes sense. About the NetSnmp library you ship and build with your package, isnt it already available on Fedora? you should try to avoid library duplicates in that case. Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review