Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 Summary: Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/expatmm/expatmm.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/expatmm/expatmm-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: ExpatMM is a C++ library that uses the efficient expat XML parser to create a C++ class base for the development of C++ event-driver parser objects. This library provides the developer with two C++ classes: - ExpatXMLParser: a generic parser where the developer must supply event methods for parse tokens, as well as supply the event method for reading input data into a local buffer. - ExpatXMLFileParser: a parser where the event method for reading input data is implemented as a file reader, with the filename being specified at instance construction. I see that rpmlint is complaining about an unused direct shlib dependency on libm. Libtool is generating a link command including -lm. So I tried relinking in the spec file, like so: cd src/.libs g++ -shared ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} ExpatXMLParser.o ExpatXMLFileParser.o ExpatMM-version.o -Xlinker -soname -Xlinker libexpatmm.so.1 -o libexpatmm.so.%{version} -lexpat ... and rpmlint still complains about the unused direct shlib dependency. It appears that libstdc++ is linked against libm, which may be the source of the problem. In any case, I don't know how to satisfy rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review