Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libstroke - A stroke interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204423 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-30 12:54 EST ------- First review for libstroke: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Licensing + This package says it is distributed under GPL, however, this does not include the copy of GPL license. I won't block this package by this issue, however, it is recommended that you ask for upstream to include GPL documents to this package. * Requires - %package -n libgstroke-devel Conflicts: libstroke-devel What does this mean? Is there any way to remove this conflict sentence? * BuildRequirs - texinfo Is this really required? It seems that makeinfo is not used in rebuilding. - libX11-devel <- required by gtk+-devel * File and Directory Ownership %{_datadir}/libstroke %{_datadir}/libstroke/java %{_datadir}/libstroke/test --- not owned by any packages. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines = Nothing. 3. Other things I have noticed = Nothing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review