Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> 2009-05-07 10:55:50 EDT --- In F11 Rawhide I see automatic dependencies on /usr/bin/pkg-config - ouch! [One can only hope that createrepo has moved the Provides into the primary metadata, too.] pkgconfig.i386 is not published in the x86_64 repo. At least not in the F10 final tree and not in F11 Rawhide either. Without looking into it in detail, I can't tell what provides /usr/lib/pkgconfig for the 64-bit targets. If nothing did, it would be a broken dependency. By default, the old "Requires: pkgconfig" is fine. It's just 1) that some packagers start adding "Requires: %{_libdir}/pkgconfig" instead (see e.g. bug 484849), and 2) you need the arch-specific binary for multi-arch development, since pkgconfig looks in $libdir/pkgconfig ... so where $libdir=/usr/lib64, it doesn't look in /usr/lib/pkgconfig, does it? And if one would set $PKG_CONFIG_PATH, would it handle multilib $libdir correctly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review