Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Simon Wesp <cassmodiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-07 09:57:54 EDT --- ========= REVOKED ========= the SRPM, i never take a look in the single SPEC-file mh, I'm in the shit. I didn't see the missing Icon-Cache and the incorrect ownage. The desktop file and the icon stuff is not needed and there are dependencies in the X. I have a CUI package with a desktop file, too.. So this wasn't a problem for me. Another thing is that the main dependency ccrypt is not available for ppc64. --- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. FAIL! --- Group: yeah, you are right again. I'm awfully sorry for making such a trouble... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review