Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #14 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-07 02:30:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Now /usr/lib/libmetalink.a is no longer packaged, I take it that's fine? > > > > Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1415019 > > SRPM URL: > > http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm > > As there is no static library present now you must remove the > Provides: libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} > line :) Ah yes, forgot about that :) Thanks for the help, both of you! Would it be possible to take a peek at my mulk packaging (bug 497948) once this one is finished? Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1415078 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review