Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #10 from Ant Bryan <anthonybryan@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-06 19:44:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7)> And you have to own the directory /usr/include/metalink > > > > %files > > %dir /usr/include/metalink > > A lot neater is to > > %files devel > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_includedir}/metalink/ Thank you, I'll go with your neater solution :) > Also, according to your files listing there is still a static library in the > devel package; you either have to exclude it from the package or make the devel > package provide libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} I added this to the devel package: Provides: libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} but the same files are included in the devel package. libmetalink-devel-0.0.3-3.fc10.i386.rpm : drwxr-xr-x /usr/include/metalink -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/metalink/metalink_error.h -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/metalink/metalink_parser.h -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/metalink/metalink_types.h -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libmetalink.la lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libmetalink.so -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libmetalink.pc Which is the static library in the devel package? Which is better, excluding it from the package or making the devel package provide libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review