[Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316


Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>  2009-05-06 13:23:19 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Review:

Thank you for the review Parag!

> suggestions:
> 1) should ask upstream to add contents to README.

I'll do that.

> 2) License tag should be GPLv2+

The source files do not specify the version of GPL in their headers. In this
case we choose GPL+ as per the guidelines. Please see instrcution #4 at
   
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F

Do I miss something?


New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: meterbridge
Short Description: Meter Bridge for JACK
Owners: oget
Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]