[Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736





--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-05-04 13:57:35 EDT ---
For 2.0.5-3 (after actually rebuilding this package)

* Group:
  - For this package: "System Environment/Libraries" is suggested.

* Cleaning buildroot at %install
  - At %install, %buildroot should be cleaned out first
    (example by:
--------------------------------------------------------------
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
make install \
 DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" \
 install
--------------------------------------------------------------

* Timestamp
  - Please use
--------------------------------------------------------------
make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}/ INSTALL="install -p" install
--------------------------------------------------------------
    to keep timestamps on installed files (especially on
    installed header files).
    This method (i.e. INSTALL="install -p") usually works
    for Makefiles generated from recent autotools.

* build error
  - -3 does not build:
    http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335547
    You have to remove libtool .la file at %install explicitly.

* Some rpmlint issue
--------------------------------------------------------------
ucommon-doc.i586: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/ucommon-doc-2.0.5/a00086_f713234fbd42ca1e50a2436c591bfa19_cgraph.map
ucommon-doc.i586: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/ucommon-doc-2.0.5/a00022_bbc045601d13615d2284212f7b491bc0_cgraph.map
ucommon-doc.i586: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/ucommon-doc-2.0.5/a00086_1290f048a8f9116ba2aafaafe228e702_cgraph.map
ucommon-doc.i586: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/ucommon-doc-2.0.5/a00086_d20f9bc12070f452b6b872d21736174a_cgraph.map
.....
.....
--------------------------------------------------------------
  - Are these empty map files needed? Or is it correct that these
    empty files are created?

! Some notes:
(In reply to comment #9)
> That is a rather interesting question.  Traditionally I have always shipped
> static libs as part of the -devel package just in case someone does actually
> want to build static linked, although I imagine is likely extremely rare to see
> this happen anymore for anything produced for a mainline distro (embedded on
> the other hand certainly...) outside I think of perhaps those who are creating
> proprietary/source secret binaries and I have no interest in that myself. 
> Shipping static libs as a separate -static package seems acceptable to me, just
> like the debug package is separate from devel.
  - If you think so, I suggest to remove static archive completely.

> The reason I set attr for ucommon-config is that automake/autoconf generated
> Make kept dropping the execute attribute when installing that file.
  - Personally, I would set permission at %install rather than using %attr 
    like
-----------------------------------------------------------------
%install
....
....
chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/ucommon-config
-----------------------------------------------------------------
    (except the case where using %attr is unavoidable like
     %attr(2755,root,games))

! Note 2
  - Just noting again that for sipwitch please submit a seperate
    review request for sipwitch.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]