[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622





--- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx>  2009-05-04 04:31:04 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
> > - Stuff under contrib/ seems to be licensed under LGPLv2+, but nothing seems to
> > be packaged from there.
> > 
> 
> the libraries that are built in contrib/ are lumped into libapbs.so* (along
> with some of the BSD licensed functions) - I've made note of the dual license,
> is it sufficient/OK to annotate the .so files as "BSD and LGPLv2+" in the
> %files section and add a PACKAGE-LICENSING file?

Damn. Then the current packaging is a no-go: you must strip apbs of the contrib
packages and package them separately.

At least maloc and pmg have upstreams here: http://fetk.org/

Btw, you're maintaining PyMOL, right? Does it include an own copy of apbs? If
so, it should be modified to use this package instead.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]