Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From overholt@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-29 22:45 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > (In reply to comment #1) > > > [root@berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm > > > W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > > > Environments (IDE) > > > W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > > > <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html> > > > > These are obviously not errors. The groups thing is wrong AFAIK since nothing's > > been standardized and that's what we're using for Eclipse itself and Subclipse > > just got approved with it. > > Do you have a reference to the subclipse review bugzilla? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191017 > > Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec > > Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm > > Build error... > /usr/share/eclipse/readme/readme_gef.html is installed but unpackaged. Gah, I'm an idiot. Fixed. Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review