Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #80 from Philippe Makowski <makowski.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-02 09:18:33 EDT --- > However we should not set all directories ownership to this sub-package. I > think that we may limit directory ownership of filesystem-subpackage by > %{fbroot} (since every sub-package depends on it) and %{fbroot}/lib (since it > doesn't harm anyone). I don't understand what you wanted to solve doing that In fact %{fbroot}/lib is need for server-common, libfbembed and libfbclient but ok, let see if you agree with this : %package filesystem Summary: Filesystem for Firebird SQL RDBMS Group: Applications/Databases %description filesystem This is the Firebird SQL Database root file system. %files filesystem %dir %attr(0755,%{name},%{name}) %{fbroot} %dir %{fbroot}/lib and add Requires: %{name}-filesystem to server-common, libfbembed and libfbclient would it be ok ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review