Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-gef - Eclipse Graphical Editing Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=204525 ------- Additional Comments From overholt@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-29 16:26 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Also, spelling error: "demostrates". Oops. Fixed. > [root@berkeley ~]# rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/SRPMS/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm > W: eclipse-gef non-standard-group Text Editors/Integrated Development > Environments (IDE) > W: eclipse-gef invalid-license Eclipse Public License - v 1.0 (EPL) > <http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-v10.html> These are obviously not errors. The groups thing is wrong AFAIK since nothing's been standardized and that's what we're using for Eclipse itself and Subclipse just got approved with it. > W: eclipse-gef macro-in-%changelog java_home > W: eclipse-gef mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs Fixed. > W: eclipse-gef no-documentation Hmm. I don't know what to do about this one. The doc plugins are in the -sdk sub-package. > W: eclipse-gef one-line-command-in-%post /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db > W: eclipse-gef one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/bin/rebuild-gcj-db Fixed. Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~overholt/eclipse-gef-3.2.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review