Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #5 from Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-30 12:12:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > So this package has already been submitted for review by Paul Lange: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490030 > > It's polite to ask Paul if he wants to update his package or would be alright > if you take over the package. If he updates his package, you can do a review > of his package. If he would rather you take over you can look at his spec file > for ideas, update your package with ideas from his spec and the other review > we've done, and I'll review. Ok, Paul marked his package as duplicated, so you can find the new ones that I'm submiting at: Spec http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb.spec Source RPM http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0-1.1.fc10.src.rpm I apply all the thing that you told (at least I think that I not forget nothing...but probably I do :-S Please check the all the spec file, but specially the %install and %file sections in witch I have more doubts.. The package seems to be builded ok, as soon as you tell me that is ok I going to test it in some machines here... Thanks again Toshio... P.D: What about the full mono/monodevelop plus the mdb and gdb packages for fed10?, how to procede with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review