Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-30 07:38:13 EDT --- My first thought was that it could be a bit confusing for those coming from CPAN to install perl-App-Foo and not find the corresponding foo binary installed. But the more I think about it, I'm starting to like the idea of giving foo a bit more prominence. Since this was reviewed as is, I've checked it in without changes, but offer a split nopaste and perl-App-Nopaste for further consideration before going ahead and arbitrarily making the change. Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-App-Nopaste.spec SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc12.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1330196 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review