Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #9 from Edwin ten Brink <edwin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-30 06:32:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Regarding your sponsorship: Do you have any other packages or have you > participated in other reviews? Just yesterday I have submitted another very small package for review (see bug 498218), which has not had a reviewer yet. I have some plans for submitting yet another package (log4cpp, http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=15190), after playing around with it a bit more. From the concept it is an interesting package, however does not seem to be very actively maintained at the moment judging from the bug, patch and feature trackers on sourceforge. I'm therefore not sure if this would make a good candidate at the moment. I have not yet participated in any reviews yet. My main activities on Bugzilla so far have been bug reporting (sometimes signalling dupes when I stumbled upon them) and commenting on other bugs which were reported by others before me. I have been actively using RedHat Linux around 1996-2002, and returned to Fedora again about a year ago. I therefore do not possess much recent experience of Fedora packaging and its guidelines, but I am familiar with rpm. Your sponsorship would be very much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review