Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-28 14:53:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Updated: SRPM: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11.src.rpm Spec: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-libsqlite3x.spec > ! How was it determined that the native's package license should be MIT? Good you noticed that. It isn't MIT, it is under zlib. There are a few copyright notices as comments in source files, eg. sqlite3x.hpp. I changed the license tag in the above spec file, and I will also change the native package. David Woodhouse (the reviewer of the native package), has also been notified, he is ok with the change. > ! The package contains documentation already present in the native > Fedora package Removed. > ! But is there a reason for having the "BuildArch: noarch" listed in > the middle of the list of Thr BuildRequies? Reordered. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review