Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-27 09:52:44 EDT --- Mat, are there C/C++ bits we're not building? If so, we should probably either build them (and make it not noarch, etc.) or remove the comments from the description about "... C, C++ ..." and rename to lpgjavaruntime. What do you think? Also, we'll need OSGi metadata for DTP, right? And I don't think we should be injecting the license if upstream doesn't include it (see [1]). I'll post a more formal review in a bit. Thanks for submitting this! [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review