Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #3 from Igor Jurišković <juriskovic.igor@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-27 06:34:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Hi Mat, > > > > first of all this is not official review. I'm in need of sponsor. > > > > URL: http://lpg.sourceforge.net/ > > It is much better to use macro. If the package name changes you will not need > > to change the url too. > > URL: http://%{name}.sourceforge.net/ > But on the other hand > - names of the projects very rarely change > - using macros in the URL / SOURCE tags block usage of certain automated > verification tools. And even simple copy / paste does not work any more. > So I beg to differ, but using macros here is not at all much better. You're right. I used macro in my review request and nobody complained. I guess both ways are right. You could wait for advanced packager to tell you what is better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review