Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 --- Comment #4 from Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-27 05:16:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > It *is* a problem. According to the file system standard, everything that comes > with the distro should be in libdir; /usr/local is for software that hasn't > been packaged and is locally built. Correct. Nothing being shipped with Fedora must install anything to /usr/local. The fact, rt3 owns some (%ghost'ed) directories therein, doesn't mean vendor supplied packages may install something there. (In reply to comment #2) > Anyway, even with 3.6 the files installed under > /usr/local/lib/rt3 are probably a problem I haven't checked all details yet, but as far as I understand (so far), your package is facing a design flaw in rt3: Lack of a "system-wide plugins directory". I am not sure what to do about it. We could try to hack rt3 to add one, we could try to change rt3 to using a plugins-directory somewhere below /usr (not /usr/local), or we can try to change/configure this package such that it installs into perl's standard system search paths. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review