Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Remi Collet <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-27 03:48:06 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Archive.src: I: checking php-ezc-Archive.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 0400c9d03f8a3bba4ec3093428e7ef2a Archive-1.3.3.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.6.1 php-posix + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Archive) = 1.3.3 php-ezc-Archive = 1.3.3-1.fc8 Good catch for php-posix (split from php-common in F11) -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review