Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-25 12:33:39 EDT --- Hold on, I said "no further questions" but I need to take a step back and ask another: * The installed package gives the rpmlint: $ rpmlint globus-openssl-module globus-openssl-module.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_openssl.so.0.0.6 /lib64/libdl.so.2 globus-openssl-module.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_openssl.so.0.0.6 /lib64/libz.so.1 globus-openssl-module.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_openssl.so.0.0.6 /usr/lib64/libltdl.so.3 globus-openssl-module.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_openssl.so.0.0.6 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 Also, some of the other globus packages that we approved have these kind of warnings. Are these warnings given because the .pc files report more links than they actually need to? Or how can we fix these? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review