Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #27 from Christian Krause <chkr@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-23 18:06:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Built packages succesfully for Fedora 11 and Fedora 10. > F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1255447 > F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1255459 > > It failed on F9. I think that's because some dependencies could not be Sorry for the late response. It looks like that Lubomir is officially taking care of this review and he may also be able to sponsor your. I've roughly looked at your most recent spec file: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/blueman.spec and I have some minor remarks: - in %postun you call "gtk-update-icon-cache" twice (detailed information: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache ) - since data files are placed in %{_datadir}/hal/fdi/information/20thirdparty, the package should require "hal". Additionally I've tested it a little bit with my cell phone and it seems to work good (don't know why I couldn't get it running previously). I think that package is now ready for a final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review