[Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310





--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx>  2009-04-23 10:31:42 EDT ---
- No need to Requires: php since it is already pulled in by php-IDNA_Convert.

- Why do you "rm -rf compatibility_test"?


rpmlint output is clean.

MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a
duplicate. OK
MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used
consistently. NEEDSFIX
- Don't mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. Choose one and stick with it.
- You could clean up the install phase by replacing
 %{__mkdir} -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}
 cp -a create.php  %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}/
 cp -a simplepie.inc  %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}/
with
 install -D -p -m 644 create.php
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}/create.php
 install -D -p -m 644 simplepie.php
%{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/php/%{name}/simplepie.php

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK
- No PECL, PEAR or CHANNEL.

MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the 
Licensing Guidelines. OK
MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
OK
- simplepie.inc contains BSD headers.

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. OK
MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK
MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package
that owns the directory. OK
MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK
MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK
MUST: Clean section exists. OK
MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK
MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect
runtime of application. OK
MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK
MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK
SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK
SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from
upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK
SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]