Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-20 16:50:54 EDT --- Thanks for the review Jussi. (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - According to README: > This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. > - License of Perl is: (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) The perl license is GPL+ or Artistic, according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#License_tag Why do you say it should be (GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) ? I never saw that until today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review