Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-19 14:18:18 EDT --- There's an examples directory (eg/), why not include it in %doc? koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307872 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): c2e97f5008c68f0b9f7f643a9ce4b21bfee572d7 Lexical-Persistence-0.98.tar.gz c2e97f5008c68f0b9f7f643a9ce4b21bfee572d7 Lexical-Persistence-0.98.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(Devel::LexAlias) >= 0.04 perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(PadWalker) >= 1.1 perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Lexical::Persistence) = 0.98 perl-Lexical-Persistence = 0.98-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Devel::LexAlias) perl(PadWalker) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review