Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496425 Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell@xxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |iarnell@xxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell <iarnell@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-19 04:53:51 EDT --- + source files match upstream. c794aef1af95ef73a51835274431ae23f5b3467f B-Hooks-OP-Check-0.15.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text not included upstream. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307368 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has an acceptable warning: perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.src: I: checking perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.x86_64: I: checking perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/B/Hooks/OP/Check/Install/hook_op_check.h perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-debuginfo.ppc: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.15 perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check::Install::Files) perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check = 0.15-1.fc11 perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check(x86-64) = 0.15-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) perl >= 0:5.008001 perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review