[Bug 226377] Merge Review: rpm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377





--- Comment #22 from Patrice Dumas <pertusus@xxxxxxx>  2009-04-18 16:24:01 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)


> > rpm.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> > 
> > "There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share."
> > 
> > Huh, what?
> 
> Most of /usr/lib/rpm/ contents would be more appropriate for /usr/share/ but
> changing that is not so simple, lots of things expect rpm scripts and stuff to
> live in the hardwired /usr/lib/rpm directory. This is not going to change
> anytime soon.

What about putting everything in /usr/share and doing a symlink to /usr/lib?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]