Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libburn - Library for reading, mastering and writing optical discs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203964 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-08-27 15:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Sorry for making your life bitter with different cdrskin version number. Doesn't make my life bitter, just makes it a little wonky to package. > Current status is that while cdrskin may make a major (or minor) step in a > period of time valuable enough to increase version number, such thing doesn't > have to be true in the same period for libburn library (and cdrskin depends on > libburn). The most obvious reason for this is that cdrskin is still not using > all of libburn options, and that libburn development is much more complicated > then the one of cdrskin itself, altought even cdrskin development isn't without > it's problems. I would say that they either really ought to be in separate tarballs, each with their own version number, or the version numbers sync'd up. Two differently versioned components in a single tarball is just plain confusing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review