Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-17 15:10:48 EDT --- Short on time today, but one quick comment: > Requiring pam_ldap by package name (F12) won't guarantee that you get one that > matches your arch on multilib boxes, so it's being required as > /%{_lib}/security/pam_ldap.so, to ensure thatwe get the pam_ldap.so that > matches the arch of the libnss_ldap.so.2 that this binary package is supplying. There's a different way to do this in F11 and perhaps F10 as well: %{_isa}. You'll see packages providing things like "nss_ldap(x86-64) = 264-2.fc11" now, so you can have a dependency like Requires: nss_ldap%{_isa} and it should do the right thing. I've no idea whether it makes any difference for what you're trying to do, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review