[Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133





--- Comment #4 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-04-16 09:15:57 EDT ---
Fedora review mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-16

+ OK
! needs attention


+ rpmlint output
  Only expected Errors/Warnings from a Mingw32 package
+ Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ Specfile name matches the package base name
! Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines

  Right now static subpackage's requires line is:
  Requires:       %{name} = %{version}

  But instead it should read:
  Requires:       %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

+ License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
  LGPLv2+
+ License matches the actual package license
  It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora libglade2 package
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm
  d1776b40f4e166b5e9c107f1c8fe4139  libglade-2.6.4.tar.bz2
  d1776b40f4e166b5e9c107f1c8fe4139  SRPM/libglade-2.6.4.tar.bz2

+ Package builds in mock (Fedora Rawhide i586)
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ Does not use Prefix: /usr
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ %files has %defattr
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
    Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
+ Static libraries should be in -static
+ Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files
    Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Filenames must be valid UTF-8

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]