[Bug 495403] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Storage - An serialization framework for Moose classes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495403





--- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl <cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-04-16 00:55:49 EDT ---
(sorry this is taking so long; $work has its way of interfering... :))

Hrm.  Well, I think that's a pretty reasonable approach.  I tend to use "is it
filtered in META.yml or otherwise hidden from the CPAN indexer", but TMTOWTDI
:)

In this case, that's a stub class that Moose uses to help do name resolution on
traits.  It's made available when the owning file is use'd, and could
reasonably be looked for if we ever get the autoreq handling Moose-y bits.  We
also have precedent for this, in that, e.g. perl-RPC-XML does the same sort of
thing (multiple packages in one .pm) and perl-App-Asciio does it in reverse
(multiple .pm's for a single class).

I guess the heart of the question is: are perl(*) provides file or package
based?  I'd say it's package based, given the way autoprov currently works, but
it does seem ripe for discussion...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]