[Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133


Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx




--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember <kalev@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  2009-04-15 17:02:27 EDT ---
Some quick notes:

- The corresponding Fedora libglade2 package is now at version 2.6.4, and
according to MinGW packaging guidelines the versions should match native
package if possible.

- Native libglade2-2.6.4-1 package has an additional libglade-secondary.patch
which is probably useful to the mingw32 package too.

- New, recently updated Fedora Packaging Guidelines prefer %global macro over
%define:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define

- Static libraries (libglade-2.0.a) need to go in a -static subpackage.

- HTML documentation in %{_mingw32_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/libglade duplicates
the one in native Fedora package and according to MinGW packaging guidelines it
should be removed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]