Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #50 from Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-12 15:56:52 EDT --- [matej@viklef redhat]$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/links-2.2-7.fc11.src.rpm links.src:30: W: unversioned-explicit-provides webclient The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. links.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-provides text-www-browser The specfile contains an unversioned Provides: token, which will match all older, equal, and newer versions of the provided thing. This may cause update problems and will make versioned dependencies, obsoletions and conflicts on the provided thing useless -- make the Provides versioned if possible. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Wouldn't it be better to at least fake some version of those Provides so that we can obsolete them later (e.g., Provides: text-www-browser 2.0, Obsoletes: text-www-browser 1.0)? Anyway, that's certainly not something which would make me not approve the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review