Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #47 from Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-11 18:43:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > If you bothered to read the above, I'm sure you would understand you are just > re-stating what was already said. OK, I may be stupid and you are über-smart, but could you please bow down to my stupidity and explain me why in the world you haven't removed that BuildConflicts then, when it is so obvious that it is not needed? > Thank you for answering the review blocker part. Now that we're clear, could > you please return the review flag back? I'm not going to reroll the package at > this point, and am going to remove the BuildConflict upon import. I will mark this package as correct, when I think it is correct. Really, is running rpmdev-bumpspec -v -c '- removing unnecessary BuildConflicts' \ -u 'Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...>' SPECS/links.spec sed -e '/^BuildConflicts/d' SPECS/links.spec rpmbuild -ba SPECS/links.spec <however you call rsync to publish your packages> too much to ask? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review