Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 Jan ONDREJ <ondrejj@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jan ONDREJ <ondrejj@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-10 06:47:50 EDT --- Well, license issues have been fixed. I see no more license problems for this package. Also no other problems. Attaching rpmlint output with only some warning, which can be ignored. [ondrejj@builder result]$ rpmlint *.rpm sems-conf_auth.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-gateway.i386: W: no-documentation sems-gsm.i386: W: no-documentation sems-mailbox.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-pin_collect.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib sems-speex.i386: W: no-documentation 14 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review