Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla <limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-09 09:32:46 EDT --- Linked spec and SRPM spec differ, using linked spec. >- I would rather suggest keeping qt4-devel in order to stay compatible with F8, >even though it is not supported anymore. No. Target rawhide, and modify the spec if necessary for older supported releases. If someone needs to build for an unsupported release, they can modify it themselves. Marcin, what exactly to you mean by separate user? Separate from what? I see nothing about it here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines Which is what we should be using as our criteria. SRPMS pick up ownership of the user under which the SRPM is built, but upon installation into a build tree, the files pick up the installing user's ownership. This is normal. You'll notice if you install a koji SRPM they report the user mockbuild as owner. Otherwise, Marcin, your comments and Alexey's repsonses are good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review