Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226377 Michal Nowak <mnowak@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #19 from Michal Nowak <mnowak@xxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-09 08:39:49 EDT --- What's blocking this review? Recent rpmlint does not complain on license because "GPLv2+" and "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ with exceptions" are valid now (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing). If anyone feels there's problem with licensing, let's block on bug fe-legal. -- Informal rpmlint review on recent rpm ===================================== SPECS/rpm.spec:571: W: macro-in-%changelog patch * Thu Sep 25 2008 Jindrich Novy <jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx> - don't treat %patch numberless if -P parameter is present (#463942) rpm.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary RPM don't get this one... rpm.src: W: strange-permission fontconfig.prov 0755 rpm.src: W: strange-permission desktop-file.prov 0755 any idea? rpm.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib "There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share." Huh, what? rpm.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /var/lib/rpm newman@dhcp-lab-124 rpmbuild $ rpmquery -f /var/lib/rpm rpm-4.7.0-0.beta1.9.fc11.x86_64 rpmlint bug? rpm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.xinetd rpm.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/rpm.log exec perm probably not necesary rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.python rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.php rpm-build.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/rpm/macros.perl ditto rpm-python.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/rpm/__init__.py ditto rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_recover ../../bin/db_recover rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_deadlock ../../bin/db_deadlock rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_stat ../../bin/db_stat rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_dump ../../bin/db_dump rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_archive ../../bin/db_archive rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_upgrade ../../bin/db_upgrade rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_printlog ../../bin/db_printlog rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_verify ../../bin/db_verify rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_load ../../bin/db_load rpm.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdb_svc ../../bin/berkeley_db_svc Build system problem? Anyone seeing this too? rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Group rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Group rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Basenames rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Basenames rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Requireversion rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Providename rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Providename rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.007 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.007 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Pubkeys rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.003 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.003 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.009 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.009 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Conflictname rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Provideversion rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Triggername rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Triggername rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Filedigests rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Filedigests rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Dirnames rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.004 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.004 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.005 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.005 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.001 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.001 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.002 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.002 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Name rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Name rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.008 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.008 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Installtid rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Installtid rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Requirename rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Requirename rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Sigmd5 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Sha1header rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/Packages rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/Packages rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rpm/__db.006 rpm rpm.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rpm/__db.006 rpm Discussed already. rpm.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%posttrans rm Life's dangerous. rpm-build.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/rpm/perldeps.pl 0644 Investigate please. rpm-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation rpm-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation Upstream problem :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review