Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Christoph Wickert <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-08 10:11:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > This is the infamous Fedora pkg-config problem, where Requires.private in the > pkgconfig file is evaluated and suffers from a missing dependency on dbus-devel > (for dbus-1.pc). Normally, BR GConf2-devel would suffice. I have seen the error message too. Thanks a lot for your explanation and the hint, Michael. (In reply to comment #10) > I didn't do autostart but fixed rest of the issues. Ok. 78d037b7591dc016546bc11e34afebd1 gnote-0.1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm fixes the outstanding issues: OK - %files OK - BuildRequires OK - Requires: desktop-file-utils is not a requirement but a BuildReqiures OK - Gconf2 for the scriptles: OK - redundant BuildRequires: libxml2-devel dropped OK - Using wildcards: %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gnote.png OK - Desktop file: --vendor="" removed Todo: - Please drop "Requires: gtkmm24" and let rpm pick up the libs automatically. - %description not ending with a dot. - If you use "V=1 make %{?_smp_mflags}" you don't need "BuildRequires: dbus-devel. These issues are minor and can be fixed after import. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review