Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-08 06:52:07 EDT --- The updated package builds in mock (Fedora 10) and its sources match upstream: fa0f44c37499433455857becad4bbcda pangomm-2.24.0.tar.bz2 fa0f44c37499433455857becad4bbcda SRPM/pangomm-2.24.0.tar.bz2 The rest of the review in comment 1 still applies. There is a tiny error in the specfile. The Source0 should be .../2.24/... not .../2.14/... due to an oversight when the package was updated: Source0: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/pangomm/2.24/pangomm-%{version}.tar.bz2 But that can be fixed without having to send an updated version for me to approve. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review