Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora@xxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-07 13:05:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > rpm -ivh /home/marca/calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > \error: Failed dependencies: > liblash.so.1()(64bit) is needed by calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc11.x86_64 > Shouldn't be lash in requirements for calf package? > In the majority of cases, we don't need to express the library dependencies explicitly. See the first paragraph of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires > Also I can't check md5sum because on the upstream page is for download version > 0.0.17. Could you send me a link for download 0.0.18? Thanks. You can find it here: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=211458 The download URL is also listed in the Source0 field in the SPEC file. You can also use spectool to see the source links: spectool -S calf.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review