Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492125 Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert <mattias.ellert@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-04-07 11:25:11 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-pangomm-2.14.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 2008-04-07 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output Only expected Errors/Warnings from a mingw package * Package is named according to Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * Spec file is named as the package * Package follows the Fedora mingw packaging guidelines * The stated license (LGPLv2+) is a Fedora approved license * The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding Fedora package * The package contains the license file (COPYING) * The spec file is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream c67228ea93dd977394d2872b61754b53 pangomm-2.14.1.tar.bz2 c67228ea93dd977394d2872b61754b53 SRPM/pangomm-2.14.1.tar.bz2 ! Accoding to guidelines the version should match the version of the corresponding Fedora package. The version in Fedora 11 is now 2.24.0 (built yesterday 2009-04-06 - so no shadow falls on the requester.) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=96784 Fedora 10 so far remains at 2.14.1 (in case a Fedora 10 package is considered) * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * BuildRequires look sane * Owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattr * %clean clears %buildroot * Specfile uses macros consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review