[Bug 203217] Review Request: csound - music synthesis system

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: csound - music synthesis system


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203217





------- Additional Comments From paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-08-24 16:40 EST -------
I'm a tad concerned that it's redefining printf for some reason in a HELL of a
lot of files. It seems to be coming from h/csoundCore.h line 119

rpmlint warnings.

src.rpm is clean

csound-5.03.0-2 : W: csound no-soname %{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so (should this not be
in the -devel package?

csound-devel : W: csound-devel no-docs (can be ignored)

csound-python: W: dangling-symlink %{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/_csnd.so
%{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so
csound-python: W: symlink-should-be-relative
%{_libdir}/python2.4/site-packages/_csnd.so %{_libdir}/lib_csnd.so

csound-java: W: no-soname %{_libdir}/lib_jsound.so
             W: no-docs
             W: symlink-should-be-relative %{_datadir}/java/csnd.jar
%{_libdir}/csound/java/csnd.jar

csound-tk: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
           W: no docs

csound-debuginfo: clean

For the missing .so files, these really should be in the csound-devel package
(and java-devel package). The tk Error must be attended to.

Your specfile is also missing Requires(post and postun): /sbin/ldconfig

Does the package not come with other vocabulary languages? If this is for the
OLPC programme, then it makes sense for translations to be in there!

In %files...

The %{_bindir} entries can be globbed to make things easier to read (or better
still, a simple for loop on the package names.

In %files devel
%{_includedir}/%{name}/* Need to be changed to %{includedir}/%{name}/ to take
ownership of the directory and files

In %files tk

I'm not sure about the .tk files in %{_libdir}. Is this the correct place for them?

csound is currently building in mock - I'll report back when it's done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]